Canadalawcourts.com - Canadian Medical Law Diagnostic Testing

_{medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound, medical, hospital, expert, british columbia, canada, canadian, medical, law, precedent, diagnostic, testing, dr, dr., doctor, mri, m.r.i., imaging, blood testing, alergy, unscientific, cat scan, ultra sound,}

Justice Blair said:

[15] .... Mr. Post.nikoff who, disenchanted with the treatment he has received to date in Canada, seeks extensive diagnostic testing, beyond that done to date, .... "Blair, J." BLAIR J.

[28] ... There is no evidence to support the allegation that Dr. White should have made further referrals or ordered more diagnostic procedures, although Mr. Post.nikoff's position is that he required further diagnostic procedures and referrals. "Blair, J." BLAIR J.

WARNING! No diagnostic testing presented as alleged by Judge Blair.

The Reality:

There is fraud. Dr. White's letter before Justice Blair said that no confirmatory testing had not been provided after 11 months and all of Dr. White's referrals. Within this same October 25, 1995 letter Dr. White writes that the discovery of prostatitis was "quite thin" and has "compounded the issue" for him. Why would the discovery of prostititis compound anything for Dr. White? Evidence from Dr. Hart included a referral to the Mayo Clinic. Contradictory to Justice Blair's claims, there was no scientific testing presented to the court from Dr. White or any of his referrals. Why did Dr. White fail to treat the Plaintiff for the 11 months of pain and suffering? Pain and suffering that continues today.

Contradicted by evidence is Justice Blair inference's that the Plaintiff was treated properly by Dr. Philip Anthony White and his referrals. No inferences can be drawn that the Plaintiff received reasonable medical diagnostic procedures. Within submissions Justice Blair was told that the very fact Dr. White failed to present any evidence of diagnostic procedures was compelling evidence that diagnostic procedures had not been done after his referrals. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. Fraud is claimed on alleged evidence that failed to appear anywhere. Judge Blair is not required to produce. Judge Blair has major problems with applying evidence honestly. Underhanded and dishonest judgement.

Fraud is Claimed:

From the Plaintiff's affidavit: (Real Court Document)

[32] Dr. White made it clear that Dr. Spelliscy, an Emergency Room physician employed by the Kelowna General Hospital should have made a better effort to provide me with proper scientific testing for my prostatitis, my xxxx xxxxxxxxxx, my xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx. The particulars of which are as follows:

a) I attended the Kelowna District Emergency Department on January 30, 1995 and presented Dr. Spelliscy with the symptoms with respect to the xxxxx xxxxxxxx after my vasectomy and the problems with respect to xxxxxxxx since the vasectomy: attached hereto and marked exhibit "Y" is the emergency room record dated January 30, 1995. Dr. White received a record of this visit.

b) I attended the Kelowna and District Hospital Emergency Department on August 28, 1995 with respect to my ongoing prostate pain and was seen by Dr. Spelliscy and diagnosed with prostatitis, I finally received antibiotic treatment for my prostate pain. I was given Cipro and Novo-profen for thirty days he also gave me a prescription for Tylenol/Codine #3 for the pain. Attached hereto and marked exhibit "G" is the Kelowna and District Hospital, Emergency Department record dated August 28, 1995. Dr. White did not agree with Dr. Spelliscy, it was Dr. White's opinion that no proper scientific testing was provided by Dr. Spelliscy as to the cause of my prostatitis; Attached hereto and marked exhibit "R" is a letter written by Dr. White to Dr. Carter dated October 25, 1995 that states "Dr. Spelliscy's consultation emergency room note which is quite thin but which has compounded the issue somewhat in that he was told that he had prostatitis although no confirmatory tests were done." this letter confirms Dr. White's opinion that Dr. Spelliscy had failed to provide me with proper scientific testing with respect to my prostatitis. This letter also confirms that Dr. White was again made aware of my prostatitis and that he intended to down play this result and continue to further deny me proper diagnostic testing. I properly expected that Dr. Spelliscy would have examined me correctly and I properly expected Dr. White to have followed up in a manner as to request and ensure that proper testing was provided to me...

Dr. Philip Anthony White's October 25,1995 letter before Justice Blair:

[ Beginning of Website ]	[ Introduction to Courts ]
[ Methods of Fraud ]	[ Tell-a-Friend ]
[ Executive Summary ]	[ Editorial Comment Board ]

	Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.
	Justice Richard Blair is evidence that he can be a fraud and a judge.