Canadalawcourts.com - British Columbia Court Transcripts

_{canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, bc, b.c., superior, courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, bc, b.c., courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, bc, b.c., courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, bc, b.c., courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, bc, b.c., courts, canadian, canada, court, transcripts, evidence, claims, fraud, british columbia, superior, courts, bc, b.c.,}

Justice Blair said:

[12] Mr. Post.nikoff first expressed concerns regarding pain and sexual difficulties which he attributed to the vasectomy to Dr.White on December 28, 1994, approximately one month after the surgical procedure. Dr. White believed his patient was suffering from post vasectomy anxieties... "Blair, J." BLAIR J.

Paragraph 18 from the Plaintiff's affidavit: (Real Court Document.)

[18] My first meeting with Dr. White after the vasectomy was scheduled 1.5 weeks after surgery, but was canceled by Dr. White and re-arranged for December 28, 1994.

The Reality:

Judge Blair has difficulties in understanding evidence and chooses to use fraudulent claims in order to construct his judgement. The Plaintiff expressed concerns immediately to both his wife and to Dr. White. No inferences can be drawn regarding Judge Blair's alleged potential delay in seeking treatment, any inference of delay was Justice Blair's own making. Bias and a total lack of credibility is claimed. No evidence supported Judge Blair's inferences of delay. These inferences are intended to mislead. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. Fraud is claimed on Justice Blair's alleged evidence that failed to appear anywhere. B.C. Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair is not required to explain or produce his alleged evidence.

	Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.
	Justice Richard Blair is evidence that he can be a fraud and a judge.

[ Beginning of Website ]	[ Introduction to Courts ]
[ Methods of Fraud ]	[ Tell-a-Friend ]
[ Executive Summary ]	[ Editorial Comment Board ]