Canadalawcourts.com - British Columbia Provincial Medical Billing Services

_{british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance, british columbia, canada, canadian, british columbia, provincial, medical, billing, services, government, b.c., kamloops, supreme, court, courts, justice, judge, legal, law, richard, blair, untruthful, dishonest, payment, allegations, allegation, proof, evidence, fraud, doctor, attendance}

Justice Blair said:

[18] Mrs. Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff deposed in her affidavit filed February 2, 1998, that she attended with her husband at Dr.White's office on September 20, 1994, and discussed birth control options including vasectomy and tubal ligation. She understood from that conversation that a vasectomy was a "simple procedure that carried no risk". Dr. White deposed that on September 20, 1994, he saw Mr. Post.nikoff with regard to another medical matter and his notes make no reference of a discussion about a vasectomy on that date. "Blair, J." BLAIR J.

The Reality:

Absolutely no signed documents of consent, consent forms or any material evidence relating to the alleged disclosure of risk or informed consent had been presented by Dr. White, Dr. Morrow and the Hospital. The Plaintiff and his wife had been led to believe there was no risk and signed nothing that agreed to any risk. No inferences may be taken of an informed consent from a hospital form that contained no disclosure of risk. Judge Blair's inferences are intended to mislead. Fraud is claimed on an alleged consent. Fraud claimed on Justice Blair's alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear anywhere. Bias and a total lack of credibility is claimed. This is underhanded and dishonest.

Question 1:

1) Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White dispute Mrs. Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff's attendance at his office on September 20, 1994?

Expert Answer 1:

1) No there is no reference in Dr. White's affidavit specifying whether or not Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff attended at his office on September 20, 1994; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.

Question 2:

2) Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White claim not to remember Mrs. Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff's attendance at his office on September 20, 1994?

Expert Answer 2:

2) No, there is no referance in Dr. White's affidavit claiming an inability to recall the attendance of Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff at his office on September 20, 1994; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.

Question 3:

3) Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White dispute any submissions that had been presented by Mrs. Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff within her affidavit?

Expert Answer 3:

3) No, the affidavit does not even refer to an affidavit presented by Mrs. Dianna Lynn Post.nikoff; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.

[ Beginning of Website ]	[ Introduction to Courts ]
[ Methods of Fraud ]	[ Tell-a-Friend ]
[ Executive Summary ]	[ Editorial Comment Board ]

	Justice Richard Blair must be removed from the Supreme Court.
	Justice Richard Blair is evidence that he can be a fraud and a judge.