The Plaintiff believes that his presentation of evidence contained within this Internet site to be verily true and believes that all the evidence referred to within this Internet web site is available and verifiable from court-room transcripts, affidavits and the evidence before the court.  A formal hearing would hear the evidence of Justice Blair's dinner parties at the homes of doctor witnesses', his refusal to step aside, obstruction of justice, the affidavit that failed to contain the alleged doctor evidence that Justice Blair claimed, the medical billing records that prove Medical Billing Fraud and Dr. Philip Anthony White got paid for the same attendance that Justice Blair claimed to never happen, the request for a trial and the court ordered closed court room. It would also hear about judicially alleged evidence that failed to appear anywhere.

Dr. Philip Anthony White even wrote a letter to Dr. Morrow asking him to provide the Plaintiff with his assurances with respect to the operation, this is within the evidence. These assurances had been provided. Any allegations made by Justice Blair regarding the legitimacy of the Plaintiff or any of the Plaintiff's evidence is purely the making of Justice Blair, no evidence disputed any of the Plaintiff's submissions. By the constructive application of evidence and claiming evidence that never appeared anywhere Justice Blair seriously publicly liable and humiliated the Plaintiff's family. Simple letters had been used as medical reports. Law and the evidence that was before the court was not applied. Questions had been introduced that Justice Blair knew could not be answered by the affidavits before him. Fraud is claimed on issues relating to an alleged consent. Fraud is claimed on Judge Blair's alleged doctor evidence that failed to appear anywhere. Although Judge Blair permitted the amending of the "Statement of Claim" in other cases, he would not permit the Plaintiff to do the same although the law permitting this was before the Court.

No witnesses had been permitted to testify, no scientific testing was required to be produced, no evidence of the alleged disclosure of risk presented by doctors nor needed by Justice Blair. The Plaintiff believes that Justice Blair simply pasted together his violent impulses in order to derive at his wanted outcome. This was a constructed judgement. Justice Blair claimed that the Plaintiff was seeking diagnostic testing "beyond what was done to date" although no real diagnostic testing had been produced or requested from the doctors. Within the evidence was a letter that Dr. White himself wrote that said no scientific testing was done after all of his referrals. Justice Blair was told within submissions that the very fact diagnostic testing was not presented to the court by Dr. White was very compelling evidence that the testing was not done. Dr. White confronted the emergency room physician Dr. Spellicy regarding his diagnosis. Why would the prostatitis, swelling and pain compound any issue for Dr. White as he said in his letter?

It should be noted that the Kelowna General Hospital and the doctor's, nurses and all support staff do an extremely good job in administration of health care to all who need of care. Many people enter the KGHospital every day with expectations of getting better, they are treated and released most often feeling much better then before. These are very professional, dedicated people working at K.G.H. This Internet web site is not to be viewed as any attack these professional health care providers, nor the many honest doctor's operating in Kelowna, B.C. This is about fraud relating to consent, construction of evidence and the Canadian Government claiming complete independence from the courts and Canadian Judicial Council. In this case the Plaintiff firmly believes the Canadian Judicial Council is the method of concealing corruption within the courts.

It must also be emphasized that this case is completely different from all who seek treatment for an existing illness in that the Plaintiff was purely healthy upon entering the Kelowna General Hospital supported by real evidence of physical examinations and documents, that had been excluded from judgement, on leaving the hospital the Plaintiff was immediately in long term pain, prostate and swelling at the site of the operation from the incorrect injection of anesthetic and other surgery related complications. The Plaintiff did not require this purely elective operation due to health reasons. The Plaintiff sought treatment immediately after surgery. The Plaintiff knew nothing of the risks of the operation and that Dr. Philip Anthony White and Dr. Donald Ray Morrow had only hospital privileges. Inferences that the Hospital consent form gave some evidence of informed consent are false as the consent forms contained absolutely no mention of risk. The experts did not see any evidence presented by the Plaintiff. Judge Blair made fraudulent claims.

Important to note after all of Dr. White's referrals and some 11 months of long term pain, prostate and swelling, the Plaintiff felt that the treatment he was provided by the Kelowna Emergency physician, Dr. Shaun Spelicy to be first class. The Plaintiff is grateful to Dr. Spellicy for treating him so well. The Plaintiff at that time thought he was well taken care of for his prostate swelling and pain. On the other hand Dr. Philip Anthony White within his letter to one of his past referrals said that Dr. Shaun Spelicy failed to treat the Plaintiff properly, missing out in correctly diagnosing the problem, the swollen prostate, the 11 months of pain. Dr. White alleged this doctor failed to provide proper scientific testing. This letter presented as evidence is included in this Internet Web site.

In 1971 the Canadian Government created the Canadian Judicial Council. It is unclear why, but one can assume in order to promote honesty, equality and fairness within the Canadian Judiciary. This totally is not the case. If democracy is built upon truth and equality in justice this also has failed. The Government has failed. Without judges being able to explain their judgements every decision is subject to fraud and influence. This is a precedent.

Absolute power over Judges conduct is now totally vested within the Canadian Judicial Council effectively making the Canadian courts "the courts of judges" not the "people's court of Canada". The Government of Canada has deemed they are totally independent of the courts and the conduct of judges, not permitting any future government involvement when there is any appearance of misconduct. This is a precedent and the accepted Government standard for Supreme Court Judges. Corruption and support are for one another. The same judges who are administering your complaints are also attending conference, playing golf and having lunches with the same Judges who have complaints filed. They are friends. Their loyalty is for each other first and foremost. Appeal was not permitted in this case. All future legal and equality rights are claimed in this case. A precedent for your family.

Dangerous is the social justice the Canadian Government has created in this case that permits some within Canadian society and courts to avoid justice, have no need for explanation and be able to make fraudulent claims while others are stripped of any right to justice and a fair trial with witnesses. This is selective justice. There are many reasons for this, one reason is of control over the ordinary people. It is to divide and concur Canadian society by the crooked judicial elite because of the thirst for unaccountable supreme control over others. In order to be seen as a part of the upper elite, Cabinet Ministers easily accept fraud because of their need for association with these players. Canadian families are being weakened in many ways, to many to mention here, by the people of influence who are in it for themselves, power, friends and associates. While the crooked Canadian Courts grow very much stronger and stronger, disturbing is they are able to do anything they please, it is easy for them to pick off Canadians one at a time. It is by entering conflict into ordinary families lives that Courts and their friends gain this corrupt strength. They become able to make fraudulent claims, hand down corrupt judgements and do unlawful acts without explanation. All senior people who are in control of society each have reasons not to permit evidence of Judicial Fraud to surface in Canada... Because this would make the Courts accountable to ordinary people. This case is no mistake for these people... Although mistake may be claimed. As in the past an "easily accepted" Government claim of "learning from this" may once again be used in order to gain criminal control over Canadians. Everything Government and the Courts do is for a reason...  remember this next time you go to court. These people set the standards all should follow. Without judgement accountability, Canadian Justice Minister's allegation that judgements being a part of public record as a "safeguard to Canadian democracy" is a borderline on delusional thinking. Fraud is claimed.

It is not acceptable to the Plaintiff's family that Justice Blair had the free-wheeling ability to say anything he wanted, he must be asked to reasonably explain and produce his alleged evidence in an effort to support fraudulent claims.

Thank you for reading Canadlawcourts Internet web site that shall be removed upon a formal hearing provided and Judge Blair brought before this family in order to answer reasonable questions. The Plaintiff hopes that you have found it useful. This is an approved standard set by the Prime Minister and Chief Justice of Canada. A precedent. All equality rights are reserved.